2,000 bar-style questions • Course study + outlines • MEE/MPT + AI feedback • Adaptive review • Analytics
For the seven bar-overlap subjects, Law School Mode uses the same 2,000-question core application bank, reorganized by course and doctrinal unit. Additional law-school subjects use separate course-specific practice and study content.
Full access to 2,000 original bar-style multiple-choice questions across the seven MBE subjects, plus BLL repair, MEE/MPT writing, AI feedback, analytics, and exam-paced simulations.
Each track starts with the work the learner actually has to do, then gives one focused explanation instead of another wall of content.
A short doctrinal prompt keeps the subject anchored to the course sequence. Feedback names the rule, the material fact, and one next step for finals.
An original MBE-style fact pattern, four choices, a concise A–D breakdown, and a spaced repair queue turn a miss into a useful repetition.
Give students one consistent practice system from doctrinal courses through bar review. Pilot and schoolwide pricing are available for programs that want broad access without a traditional four-figure prep bill.
Law school rewards knowing what to prioritize, not filling every hour with passive review. Testify keeps the experience close to a real course: retrieve the rule, apply it, see why the other choices fail, and return to the weak point later.
Start with the subject and unit your professor is teaching. Switch to mixed practice when finals demand transfer.
Questions are independently authored and pass documented structural quality checks before release. Substantive attorney and professor review remains a separate beta-to-launch workstream; no original item is presented as official NCBE content.
We track first attempts, timing, weak areas, and writing practice. We will publish outcome percentages only after a documented cohort and denominator exist.
Practice is most useful when it forces recall, gives feedback, and returns weak material after a delay. Testify turns that sequence into the default workflow instead of an optional add-on. Retrieval, spacing, interleaving, and feedback guide the loop; no study method can guarantee a result.
State the governing rule before recognition gives it away.
Use the rule under a realistic fact pattern and exam pacing.
Track first-attempt accuracy, response time, and performance on higher-priority doctrine.
Missed high-priority and weak rules move to the front.
Return to missed rules later instead of memorizing answer letters.
Transfer the rule into MEE and MPT organization and analysis.
Due reviews, high-priority misses, weak areas, unseen questions, timed sets, and custom sets.
Active recall first, rule reveal second, spaced scheduling third.
Rubric-based formative feedback with an estimated 1–6 practice score and criterion-level coaching.
First attempts, timing, repeats, subject mastery, and test-priority performance stay separate so the dashboard tells the truth.
Ask Wit for help with a rule, answer choice, MBE question, MEE, MPT, or study strategy without leaving your Testify workflow.
Test the product. Try to break it. Tell us what works and what does not.
Testify is designed around retrieval practice, feedback, spaced re-exposure, interleaving, and transfer from recognition to written application.
Recall the rule without looking. Recognition is easier than production; the bar requires production under pressure.
Apply the rule to facts with one-best-answer discipline and realistic timing.
High-, medium-, and lower-priority doctrine helps allocate review time without pretending NCBE publishes doctrine-by-doctrine probabilities.
Missed rules return after a delay. Immediate repetition can create answer familiarity without durable rule memory.
Use the doctrine again in issue spotting, rule statements, analysis, task compliance, and professional organization.
Can you state it without seeing it?
Can you separate the best answer from a plausible distractor?
Can you use the same doctrine in an essay?
Are you repairing the rules most worth knowing cold?
Can you make the decision at exam pace?
Can you retrieve it days later?
For Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Contracts, Criminal Law & Procedure, Evidence, Real Property, and Torts, Law School Mode draws from the same 2,000-question core application bank used in Bar Review and reorganizes it by course and doctrinal unit. Additional law-school subjects use separate course-specific practice and study content, so students can drill one unit before a midterm or final instead of opening an all-subject bar bank.
MBE scope: each of the seven MBE subjects represents approximately 14.3% of the 175 scored questions (25 questions). This is a current exam blueprint reference, not a prediction of any individual administration.
Jurisdiction & venue → pleadings → joinder → discovery → trial → preclusion & appeals.
Formation → consideration → defenses → terms/SOF → performance & breach → remedies → third parties → UCC risk/warranties.
General principles → homicide → property offenses → inchoate crimes → complicity → defenses.
Intentional torts → privileges → negligence → causation/damages → vicarious liability → strict/products → defamation/privacy.
Estates → concurrent ownership → landlord-tenant → easements/servitudes → deeds/recording → mortgages → land-use doctrines.
Justiciability → federal powers → separation of powers → federalism → due process/equal protection → First Amendment → takings.
Start with focused unit practice while the material is new. Before finals, switch into a timed subject simulation so the issues are interleaved the way a professor can test them.
Practice only jurisdiction, only hearsay, only negligence, or the unit your class is covering now.
Build a timed mixed set from one subject to expose weak transitions between topics.
Missed rules move into the same spaced review engine used for bar prep.
When finals end and bar prep begins, your study history does not have to live in a different system.
Testify Bar Review includes a 2,000-question original bar-style multiple-choice bank across the seven MBE subjects, with black-letter law retrieval, timed decisions, written analysis, and targeted repair. Testify questions are original educational content and are not represented as licensed or endorsed NCBE questions.
Use BLL Sprint and the searchable Rule Library to produce the governing law before answer choices make recognition easy.
Move into realistic MBE-style questions, Adaptive 10, Timed 25, Diagnostic 70, custom sets, and missed-rule repair.
First-attempt accuracy, response time, high-priority misses, and spaced review keep weak doctrine visible.
Use MEE and MPT drills with rubric-based formative AI feedback to practice issue spotting, rule statements, analysis, and organization.
Run a timed 100-question mixed MBE session, then review the rules and decisions that broke down under pace.
Choose your jurisdiction and planned administration. Testify compares that combination against its regularly refreshed official exam-reference data and identifies the study path as Legacy UBE, NextGen UBE, state-specific, or pending. No account, email, or payment information is required.
Build a routine around rule recall, focused practice, timely feedback, and purposeful writing.
Visual, segmented doctrine and exam-skills lessons built in Testify’s high-clarity teaching format, with diagrams, decision trees, timelines, examples, and Wit available alongside the learning flow.
Testify brings adaptive practice, black-letter-law retrieval, spaced repair, writing feedback, timing, test-priority guidance, notes, analytics, and mobile study into one workflow. It is designed to reduce tool-switching without pretending every competitor product has the same content or services.
The protected review contains 2,000 independently authored original bar-style multiple-choice questions across seven MBE subjects, plus 84 separate short BLL knowledge checks and 18 writing exercises. The full 2,000-question core bank is active for evaluation alongside rule retrieval, spaced repair, writing, AI feedback, analytics, notes, and reporting. Newly added or materially changed content remains subject to version-controlled QA and legal re-review.
This is a short sample, not the whole course and not a seven-day credit-card trial. Try the interactive questions, compare the law-school and bar-review formats in one short preview. No credit card is required and nothing auto-renews from this preview.
See how one subject is split into normal course units for class-by-class and finals review.
Preview the recall-first workflow that turns rules into spaced repairs.
Answer one original question in each current MBE subject and get an instant explanation.
Preview MEE issue mapping and an MPT-style task without exposing paid AI grading.
See the first-attempt, timing, weak-area, and review-queue logic used inside the protected app.
Bar Review includes full-pacing mixed practice: a timed 100-question simulated MBE session plus a full-length Simulated MBE 200 split into two 100-question, 180-minute sessions with a midpoint break. Testify scores all 200 practice questions for learning; on the real MBE, NCBE scores 175 questions and embeds 25 indistinguishable unscored pretest questions.
Prompt: State the core rule for federal diversity citizenship of a corporation before looking at an answer choice.
Core rule: A corporation is a citizen of every state where it is incorporated and the one state where it has its principal place of business.
Paid access schedules missed rules back into spaced review.
A corporation is a citizen of both its state of incorporation and the state of its principal place of business. The plaintiff is diverse from both corporate citizenships, and the amount exceeds $75,000.
Authority anchor: 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(a), 1332(c)(1).Viewpoint discrimination is an especially forbidden form of content discrimination. A traditional public forum cannot be opened to one side of a political issue while excluding the opposing viewpoint.
Authority anchor: Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of Univ. of Va., 515 U.S. 819 (1995).A merchant's signed writing giving assurance that an offer will be held open can be irrevocable without consideration, but the statutory period of irrevocability cannot exceed three months.
Authority anchor: U.C.C. § 2-205.Terry permits a limited protective frisk for weapons when an officer conducting a lawful stop reasonably suspects the person is armed and dangerous. The frisk is for safety, not a general evidence search.
Authority anchor: Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968).A statement relating to a startling event made while the declarant remains under the stress of excitement caused by that event can qualify as an excited utterance.
Authority anchor: Fed. R. Evid. 803(2).A joint tenant can generally convey the joint-tenant interest during life. The conveyance severs survivorship as to that share, leaving the transferee as a tenant in common with the remaining owner.
Authority anchor: Traditional concurrent-ownership doctrine.Negligence per se can establish the duty/breach standard when the plaintiff is within the protected class and the accident is the type the statute was designed to prevent. Causation and damages still must be shown.
Authority anchor: Traditional negligence-per-se doctrine; Restatement (Third) of Torts: Liability for Physical and Emotional Harm § 14.Prompt: A seller unequivocally tells a buyer two weeks before delivery that the seller will not perform a signed goods contract. The buyer immediately contracts with another supplier at a higher reasonable price. Analyze the buyer's principal UCC rights and remedies.
The public preview stops here. AI writing review remains inside protected Testify access.
Task: Draft the opening section of an objective memorandum using a short fictional File and Library. Identify the governing rule, organize the relevant facts, and explain which facts matter most.
The protected app includes two full 90-minute MPT simulations, four condensed File + Library reps, and formative closed-universe AI review.
Start with the law-school experience, add bar review when your exam cycle begins. The plans are intentionally different because a 1L studying negligence does not need the same workflow as a graduate simulating an MBE session.
Month-to-month access for current law students. For the seven bar-overlap subjects, Law School Mode uses the same 2,000-question core bank as Bar Review, reorganized by course and doctrinal unit; additional law-school subjects use separate course-specific material.
One bar-exam cycle with the full 2,000-question original bar-style multiple-choice bank, mixed-subject practice, writing tools, adaptive repair, and simulated exam sessions. No monthly renewal during the covered cycle.
Testify is digital-first and practice-first. The founding price is designed around the work most students actually use rather than forcing every buyer to fund services they may not need.
No printed-book or large classroom infrastructure is built into the price.
The product centers application, repair, writing, analytics, outlines, and Wit instead of a giant lecture catalog.
Testify does not currently bundle private tutoring or dedicated human essay grading into every purchase.
The core bank is independently authored. Students specifically seeking licensed NCBE questions should factor that difference into their choice.
Public checkout is intentionally off during private beta. Leave one email and tell us which track matters to you. Testify will use it only for launch/access updates unless you separately opt into something else.
Roadmap, Outline Book, and Attack View are available inside Beta Access now in a protected in-app reader. Beta accounts already sync study progress to the authenticated Testify account. Public payment and paid-plan entitlements remain intentionally deferred until launch-readiness review is complete.
Beta 2 is underway. Invited testers can sign in through Beta Access at the top of the page.
When checkout is turned on, the flow should stay simple: create a Testify account, choose Law School Study or Bar Review, complete secure checkout, and attach the purchased entitlement to that account. Study Aids will be included in the plan shown at checkout; cancellation, renewal, receipts, and restore-access controls will be visible before payment.
An eligible paid Bar Review Exam Cycle member who completes 100% of the required Testify Bar Review coursework, earns at least 75% on the designated final locked mastery assessment on the qualifying attempt, sits for the immediately following covered bar administration, and receives a nonpassing result may request a refund of the Testify Exam Cycle purchase price actually paid, up to $249, one time, after submitting the required proof.
Law School Study is $14.99/month for course-sequenced practice. Bar Review is $249 one-time for an exam cycle.
Testify uses original practice simulations rather than licensed NCBE questions. No study product can guarantee an outcome.Tell us about your school, program, or bar-success cohort. Schoolwide and pilot access is designed to stay substantially below traditional full-service prep pricing while giving students one consistent practice system from doctrinal courses through bar review.
Testify is selecting a limited group of law students and recent graduates for Beta 2.0. The application takes about two minutes and helps us choose testers who will actually use the platform and tell us what needs fixing.
We review applications individually. 2Ls, 3Ls, and recent graduates are especially useful for this round, but other law students may apply.
Testify publishes reviewer wording only after the reviewer approves the final copy. These are beta experiences, not pass-rate claims, paid ratings, or promises of an exam outcome.
“I’m obsessed with this. Being able to practice specific sections of the outlines is amazing. It’s the best study tool I’ve ever used.”
“I liked it honestly. The practice builds confidence while testing your knowledge.”
“I’m surprised by the amount of content y’all have in here — so sick. I kept finding more to explore.”
“Learning the topic and then working through the practice questions is super helpful. I love the setup of the whole website.”
“I love that Testify can break down anything into plain language. The Exam Takeaway is gold.”
“Great app. I love it. The design, functionality, features, price point, and AI integration are all a 10. It’s perfect for someone going through law school.”
These quotes were drawn from feedback provided during free private Beta Access and approved by the named reviewers for publication using the abbreviated attribution shown. Beta participation is not conditioned on positive sentiment. Additional reviews will appear only after separate approval of the exact final wording.
Questions about your access, study progress, or an explanation? Contact us directly.
Please include “Testify Support” in the subject line and describe the device/browser, page, and what happened.
For a content correction, include the question number and the specific rule or explanation you want checked. Please do not send client records or confidential case information.
Inside Beta Access, chat with Wit, your witty witness for a focused study explanation. She is a study aid, not legal advice, and she does not replace your professor, current law, or official exam materials.
Quick answers to common questions about your account and practice.
Confirm you are using the approved Beta Access email and your current Testify password. First-time testers use the issued beta password once, choose a personal password, and then accept the single Rights & Reservations assent during setup. If sign-in still fails, report the exact message with your device and browser details.
Sign in to your Testify Account with the same approved Beta Access email. Study progress syncs to that account so it can follow you across supported devices and browsers.
Use “Can I Get a Witness?!” to report the drill, your response, and the disputed feedback. AI review is formative and can make mistakes.
Use the in-question report control. Accuracy reports are treated as release-blocking content QA, not cosmetic feedback.
Testify support is available at help@testifylearning.com. Before paid release, Testify will publish staffed support hours, expected response windows, escalation procedures, and security-reporting instructions.
Testify is being designed toward WCAG 2.2 AA practices, including keyboard access, focus states, contrast, responsive text, and reduced-motion support. Report accessibility barriers to the support address above.
A concise Beta Access rights notice for Testify reviewers. The full Legal & Trust Center controls if this summary and the full terms ever differ.
Beta Access is a limited, revocable, nontransferable license for individual evaluation and study. Credentials may not be shared, sold, published, scraped, reverse engineered, or used to reconstruct protected question banks, answer keys, scoring logic, or proprietary materials, except where a restriction cannot lawfully be enforced.
Private screens, access codes, nonpublic questions, answer explanations, drafts, recordings, screenshots, and other protected beta materials must stay private unless Testify gives written permission to share them.
We want criticism, corrections, bug reports, and ideas. Submitting feedback gives Testify permission to use that feedback to improve the product, but does not transfer ownership of a reviewer’s preexisting material. A testimonial or public quote requires separate permission for the exact final wording.
Testify and Wit are educational tools, not legal advice or official bar grading. Law, exam formats, and jurisdiction rules change. Current primary authority and official bar/NCBE materials control. When an answer depends on jurisdiction, date, facts, procedure, or an exception, Testify should say so rather than flattening the rule.
Beta accounts may sync answers, timing, drafts, notes, analytics, Wit conversations, and feedback so the product can function across supported devices and be evaluated. Do not submit client files, privileged material, medical records, or other sensitive personal information.
Testify is independently authored and is not affiliated with or endorsed by NCBE, any state bar, court, law school, BARBRI, Themis, UWorld, or another commercial prep provider. Third-party names may be used only for truthful reference, comparison, or source identification.
The full Terms include binding individual arbitration and a class-action waiver, a 30-day arbitration opt-out procedure, small-claims and limited injunctive-relief exceptions, applicable-law language, and preservation of rights that cannot legally be waived.
Except for the limited access granted to the reviewer, Testify reserves all rights in its original software, branding, selection and arrangement of materials, authored questions, explanations, Study Aids, graphics, workflows, and other protectable content.
Beta terms last updated October 1, 2026. These terms show the disclosures, consumer protections, content limits, privacy treatment, and dispute framework for Testify’s review environment. Final entity-specific counsel review remains part of the public-release process.
Alabama status: the name Testify Learning, LLC is reserved with the Alabama Secretary of State for one year, beginning September 24, 2026 and expiring September 24, 2027. The Certificate of Formation has not yet been filed, so the LLC is not yet represented here as a formed entity.
Testify is an educational law-school study and bar-exam preparation product. It does not guarantee any law-school grade, class rank, exam score, scaled bar score, admission decision, bar passage, employment result, or licensing outcome. Readiness metrics are study analytics, not predictions by a professor or board of bar examiners.
Testify provides educational content, not legal advice or legal representation. Use of the product does not create an attorney-client relationship. Official admission authorities, current law, and official exam instructions control.
The current private-review bank contains independently authored practice simulations. It does not contain live, recalled, retired, or licensed NCBE questions. Testify is not affiliated with or endorsed by NCBE, any state bar, any bar admissions authority, or any bar-review provider.
AI writing feedback is a formative estimate based on the selected Testify prompt and rubric. It can be incomplete or wrong. A displayed 1–6 estimate is not an official MEE/MPT grade, jurisdiction score, scaled score, or prediction of passing. Jurisdictions grade written components under their own processes, and relative grading cannot be recreated without the relevant grader materials and examinee cohort.
Law changes. Preview content may be corrected or updated. Users should compare important rules against current primary authority and official/licensed study materials. Testify flags known future-law transition issues, including the projected December 2026 Evidence Rule 801 amendment, for confirmation before the February 2027 content freeze.
Beta Access uses a Testify Account tied to the approved reviewer email. Study answers, drafts, course notes/checkmarks, Wit conversation history, flags, and detailed study analytics are cached on the current device and synced to that authenticated account so progress can follow the reviewer across supported devices and browsers. Testify also stores the reviewer name and email, beta acceptance timestamp and acknowledgments, entry/activity timestamps, approximate active-use duration, aggregate QA activity, question-attempt details, submitted feedback, and account-sync timestamps server-side. Active-use duration is measured only while the beta page is visible and recently active; hidden tabs and extended inactivity are excluded. The public marketing site also records limited first-party navigation events—such as viewing Law School, Bar Review, Pricing, Free Preview, Beta Apply, or Sign In—using a temporary session identifier, coarse device category, and referral/source path. Those public-funnel events do not include the visitor’s name, email, question answers, drafts, or Wit content. If you voluntarily join the Founding Access List, Testify stores the email address, selected product track, submission time, and limited referral/campaign fields solely to administer launch/access communications unless you separately consent to something else. When you message Wit, the current message, relevant screen context, and synced conversation context are sent to the hosted AI service for processing so Wit can follow the thread. AI writing review likewise sends the submitted draft and relevant exercise/source context for processing.
Testify's public pages may use the Meta Pixel (Meta Platforms) to measure advertising visits and beta-interest conversions. If enabled, Meta may receive your IP address, browser/device identifiers, page URL, and cookie or advertising identifiers under its own privacy terms. This optional third-party marketing measurement is OFF by default and is not needed to study, apply for beta, or sign in. You can change your choice on this device below. Browser Global Privacy Control signals are honored. Disabling future measurement does not itself delete information already received by Meta. Separate limited first-party product and public-funnel analytics described above may still operate.
Optional marketing measurement is off on this device.
For privacy, access, correction, account-closure, or data-deletion requests, contact help@testifylearning.com. Clearing a Wit chat or local progress is not the same as deleting every server-side record or data previously processed by a service provider. Requests will be handled according to applicable law and verified service capabilities. Do not submit confidential client files, privileged material, medical records, or other sensitive information in Wit or AI writing review.
Testify will not fabricate reviewer experiences, require positive sentiment in exchange for an incentive, or suppress truthful negative reviews. Invited beta reviewers receive free Beta Access and may also receive complimentary future Bar Review access for providing a thorough review; that benefit is not conditioned on positive sentiment. Promotional wording may be drafted from feedback actually provided only with permission and will not be published until the reviewer approves the exact final copy. A material connection, including free beta access or complimentary future review access, will be disclosed where required.
By submitting product feedback, corrections, ideas, tips, or suggestions through Beta Access, the reviewer gives the current Testify project owner(s) and any successor Testify operating entity a nonexclusive, perpetual, worldwide, royalty-free right to use, adapt, and incorporate that submitted feedback to improve Testify. This does not transfer ownership of the reviewer’s pre-existing materials or professional know-how, and it does not authorize public quotation or endorsement without separate promotional consent and exact-copy approval.
© 2026 Testify project. All original Testify interface copy, original practice content, rule-learning architecture, and original brand artwork are reserved to their current lawful owner(s) unless and until assigned to a formed entity. No claim is made to third-party exam questions, marks, or materials. “Testify” requires trademark clearance before commercial launch.
For the planned paid launch, Law School Study is $14.99 per month and renews on the monthly billing anniversary until canceled. There is no minimum-term contract. Subscribers may cancel at any time through a clearly accessible self-service billing portal when checkout launches. Cancellation stops the next renewal; study access continues through the end of the current paid billing period. A payment already made for that period is not prorated or refunded solely because of cancellation, except where applicable law requires otherwise. Bar Review Exam Cycle is a separate $249 one-time purchase for the identified administration, without automatic monthly renewal. Separate published refund rights, applicable law, and any finalized Pass Promise are not limited by the monthly cancellation policy. The Free Preview does not collect payment information or start a trial or recurring charge. These are proposed paid-launch terms, not an active subscription offering. Before charging customers, production checkout must conspicuously disclose the total charge, renewal timing, affirmative billing consent, cancellation method, taxes, refund rules, and applicable terms, with a functional self-service cancellation route.
An eligible paid Bar Review Exam Cycle member may qualify for one refund of the Testify Exam Cycle purchase price actually paid, up to $249, after an unsuccessful qualifying administration only if the member: purchased the eligible Exam Cycle plan before the published cutoff; completed 100% of required Testify Bar Review coursework before the exam; earned at least 75% on the designated final locked mastery assessment under the program rules; sat for the immediately following covered bar administration; maintained an account in good standing without prior refund or chargeback; and submitted the official score/result documentation and other reasonable verification within 30 days after results. The Promise refunds Testify’s eligible purchase price only; it does not reimburse bar application fees or other exam costs. One refund maximum per person. Testify may verify submitted records and deny altered, incomplete, duplicate, or fraudulent claims. Beta Access and Law School Study are not eligible unless separately converted into a qualifying Bar Review Exam Cycle purchase.
Except for an eligible small-claims matter and a request by either party for temporary injunctive relief concerning intellectual property, account security, or misuse of confidential content, a dispute arising out of or relating to Testify, these Terms, a purchase, or use of the service will be resolved by binding individual arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1–16, administered by the American Arbitration Association under its applicable Consumer Arbitration Rules. Before filing arbitration, the claimant must send written notice to help@testifylearning.com describing the dispute and requested relief and allow 30 days for informal resolution. Covered disputes will proceed only on an individual basis; class, collective, consolidated, and representative proceedings are waived to the fullest extent permitted by law. Each side waives jury trial for covered disputes. Consumer arbitration fees will be allocated under the governing AAA rules, and Testify will pay amounts those rules require it to pay. A user may opt out of this arbitration provision within 30 days after first accepting these Terms by emailing help@testifylearning.com with the subject “ARBITRATION OPT OUT” and the user’s name, account email, and acceptance date. Alabama law governs non-arbitration issues except where federal law or nonwaivable consumer law controls. If a provision is unenforceable, it will be severed only to the extent required while the remainder remains effective.
Testify access is personal and may not be shared, resold, scraped, systematically copied, reverse engineered, or used to reconstruct or distribute protected question banks, answer keys, scoring logic, or confidential review materials. Users are responsible for protecting account credentials and promptly reporting suspected unauthorized access. These restrictions do not limit rights that cannot lawfully be waived.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, Testify is provided “as is” and “as available” for educational use, without a promise of uninterrupted availability, error-free operation, a particular score, or a particular admissions result. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Testify will not be liable for indirect, incidental, special, exemplary, or consequential damages arising from use of the service. Any direct-liability cap in final paid terms should be tied to the amount actually paid for the service during the applicable period, subject to nonwaivable consumer rights and exclusions required by law.
Testify aims to support keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic labels, color contrast, responsive layouts, and reduced-motion preferences. Accessibility conformance should be independently audited before paid launch. Accessibility concerns may be sent to the support contact.
This edition contains 2,000 independently authored original bar-style multiple-choice questions across the seven MBE subjects, 84 separate short BLL knowledge checks, 12 essay drills, 2 full 90-minute MPT simulations, and 4 condensed performance exercises with fictional Files and Libraries. All 2,000 application questions are active in the current core bank. Bank initialization enforces count, structure, unique-item, subject-balance, answer-position, explanation, and authority requirements; additional editorial and substantive legal re-review remains version-controlled and ongoing. Law School Course Mode reorganizes the same core bank by doctrinal unit for overlapping courses, while Bar Review adds mixed-subject diagnostics, a timed Simulated MBE 100, and a full-length Simulated MBE 200 using two 100-question, 180-minute sessions. Testify scores all 200 simulation items for formative learning; the real MBE contains 175 scored questions distributed evenly at 25 scored questions per subject plus 25 indistinguishable unscored pretest questions. Testify does not represent its question bank as licensed or endorsed NCBE content or as a psychometrically validated score predictor. Practice accuracy and AI writing estimates are not law-school grades, scaled bar scores, or validated passing probabilities.
Requesting AI writing review sends your draft and the exercise materials to the hosted AI service for processing. Do not submit real client files, privileged information, or sensitive personal records. Study progress, drafts, and Wit conversation history may be synced to your authenticated Testify Account; feedback submissions are stored by the service. Contact support for questions about submitted feedback or deletion requests. Clearing local progress does not delete feedback already submitted to the service.
Selected Testify beta content has undergone internal legal-content review, and broader attorney and professor subject-matter review remains part of the pre-release process. Newly added or materially changed questions, corrections, outline material, and legal updates remain version-controlled for ongoing QA and re-review before public commercial release. Testify does not represent the present 2,000-question original authored bank as licensed or endorsed NCBE content, as psychometrically validated, or as exempt from continuing legal-version review.
A focused law-school-to-bar study system for the next exam in front of you.
Approved testers can sign in using the email address on their private invitation. Depending on the sign-in method, secure email verification may be requested.
If a blank sign-in page appears, return to Testify and open testifylearning.com directly in Safari. You can also avoid the external sign-in window by setting a personal Testify password.
Already invited to Beta 2? Use the exact email from your invitation to sign in above. You do not need to apply again.
TESTIFY
Know the rule. Apply the rule. Repair the miss. Do it again.
First-attempt performance across the curated application bank.
Five-minute recall → Adaptive 10 → review high-priority misses → one writing transfer.
See something brilliant, confusing, inaccurate, slow, or ugly? Tell us while you are looking at it.
Choose a doctrinal subject, drill only the unit your class has reached, then run a timed mixed course-final simulation.
Adaptive, timed, diagnostic, custom, missed, and full-bank foundational-law modes.
Separate select-one/select-two, integrated, counseling, research, drafting, and performance-task skill practice.
Draft first, then receive rubric-based formative feedback and a practice score estimate.
Retrieve black-letter law, schedule repairs, and retest weak doctrine.
Recall → apply → diagnose → repair → write.
Choose your unit. Recall the rule. Practice the facts. Keep your syllabus notes beside the work.
Organize the subjects and units you take each year and term. Your course plan syncs to your account.
Select only the units your professor covers and arrange them in syllabus order. Your choices also scope the course-final simulation.
Questions are grouped by the doctrine named in each reviewed item.
Bar Practice includes 2,000 original bar-style multiple-choice questions across seven MBE subjects. Law School Mode uses this same core bank for those overlapping subjects, reorganized by course and doctrinal unit; the separate BLL bank remains short and rule-focused.
Legacy MBE reference: the seven MBE subjects are evenly represented at approximately 14.3% each of the 175 scored questions. NextGen users should treat this bank as foundational-law application practice, not as a simulation of the NextGen format.
Retrieve a rule first with BLL Sprint.
Use facts and review why the strongest wrong choice loses.
Practice pace after you know the material against the active 2,000-question bank.
Choose a subject, topic, or exact rule for focused practice. Use All topics + Previously practiced topics for learned review, or All topics + All available when you intentionally want a full-subject exam mix.
Focused practice stays inside the topic or exact rule you select.
Choose an MBE-style block, MEE writing drills, or both. If you choose both, Testify runs the multiple-choice block first and then takes you to the selected essays. Random/all-subject settings give you a mixed study set.
Testify will label the workflow based on the exam format saved in your account.
Testify's study-priority estimate considers doctrine breadth and exam emphasis. It is not a probability of appearing on the exam; NCBE does not publish doctrine-by-doctrine testing probabilities.
Twelve Legacy UBE MEE drills for administrations that still use the MEE. If your selected administration is NextGen, use these as doctrine and writing enrichment rather than as a NextGen-format simulation.
Estimated 1–6 practice score + issue spotting, rule accuracy, analysis, organization, task compliance, strengths, priorities, and next-step coaching.
Two full Legacy UBE-style 90-minute MPT simulations plus four condensed File + Library reps, all with original fictional law and closed-universe AI review. NextGen uses a different integrated format, so these remain transferable performance-skill practice rather than a NextGen simulation.
Choose a full 90-minute simulation or a condensed 45-minute drill. Harbor Workshop and Cedar Health include complete File + Library packets, model responses and self-review guidance; both are original educational drafts awaiting independent substantive and difficulty review. Your earlier exercises and saved drafts remain available. Use either clock when you intentionally want a different practice length.
Each exercise uses its own fictional File and Library. The first two are full 90-minute simulations; the remaining four are explicitly condensed reps. Review applies only the supplied closed-universe law and record and evaluates task compliance, synthesis, application, and organization. Scores remain formative estimates, not official NCBE or jurisdiction scores.
Recall the full black-letter rule, identify its elements and exceptions, then apply it. Search by subject, doctrine, or phrase.
As of this build, the federal judiciary lists an amendment to Rule 801(d)(1)(A) for a projected December 1, 2026 effective date. Projected amendments can still be delayed or withdrawn. Testify therefore keeps the present formulation flagged until the effective status is confirmed for the February 2027 content freeze.
Use short knowledge checks to make the rule automatic, then reinforce it with retrieval cards and spaced review.
BLL Sprint is intentionally short and rule-focused. The main Question Bank uses fuller bar-style hypotheticals for application and discrimination.
Say or write the full rule before revealing.
Accuracy, timing, test priority, and repetition stay separate so progress is not cosmetic.
Priority is Testify editorial study guidance, not a published NCBE probability.
Specific criticism beats compliments. Nothing becomes a promotional testimonial without separate permission.
This private preview only shows which feedback was marked for possible promotional follow-up. Nothing here is approved for public use until the reviewer separately approves the exact final wording.
Current capability, known limits, and release gates in one place.
Application Question Bank: Testify maintains 2,000 independently authored original bar-style multiple-choice questions, all active across the seven MBE subjects. Bank initialization enforces the exact 2,000-question count, unique IDs and normalized stems, four unique answer choices, valid keyed answers, balanced subject distribution, bounded answer-position distribution, explanations, authority anchors, and required teaching fields. Separate editorial cue scans and continuing substantive legal review remain part of version-controlled QA.
Coverage blueprint: the 2,000-question core bank is balanced across the seven MBE subjects, with subject totals differing by no more than one question. Future additions should remain quota-controlled against the applicable exam subject-matter categories rather than added as random volume.
BLL Sprint: 84 separate short knowledge checks, exactly 12 per subject, with authored A–D rationales and Fact Flips. These are deliberately not counted as bar-style simulations.
Drafting standard: clear and concise fact patterns; only the actors and facts needed to make the key correct and distractors plausible; core tested doctrine and application rather than rote trivia; one clearly best answer; responsive, reasonably parallel options; no all-of-the-above/combination gimmicks; authority-supported explanations; and answer-specific reasoning. Beta first-attempt selection and timing data now feed a separate preliminary item-calibration loop so weak distractors and abnormal item performance can be identified for revision.
Writing: 12 MEE drills + 2 full 90-minute MPT simulations + 4 condensed File + Library reps.
Still separate from the private-review set: licensed NCBE inventory, commercial-scale psychometric data, and a full production-grade NextGen exam simulation.
MBE: 200 questions, 175 scored + 25 unscored; two three-hour sessions.
MEE: six 30-minute essays using the post-July-2026 recall areas.
MPT: two 90-minute closed-universe tasks in the February 2027 legacy UBE. Conflict of Laws, Family Law, Trusts & Estates, and Secured Transactions are not post-July-2026 legacy MEE recall subjects. NextGen jurisdictions use a different integrated format; this beta does not yet simulate the full NextGen exam.
Use the install button for an app-like Home Screen icon and standalone view. On iPhone, Safari requires the Share → Add to Home Screen flow.
Account sync: Your progress is tied to your authenticated Testify Account and syncs across supported devices.Profile, route + sync
What has to be true before Testify can substantiate market-leading claims.
Independent educational review environment. Original simulations, not licensed NCBE questions. No guaranteed result. AI feedback is formative. Official law and admission instructions control. The Alabama entity name is reserved; entity formation remains pending.
Open a subject, learn the black-letter rule in a clean mobile-first outline, switch to a compressed Attack View, and move directly from the rule into practice. Every outline is printable now. Use Print / Save PDF for a clean study copy without the in-app navigation or Wit controls.
Use the Roadmap, Outline Book, Attack View, authority anchors, plain-English explanations, examples, exam takeaways, and direct practice links. The printable edition is active now and is formatted for clean printing or saving as a PDF.
Start with the unit your professor is teaching, then add your own rule statement, exceptions, and hypos. The scaffold keeps the page useful without pretending one commercial outline matches every syllabus.
Civil Procedure • Contracts • Criminal Law • Torts • Property • Constitutional Law.
A compact brief that protects attention: facts that matter, issue, holding, rule, reasoning, and the professor’s likely exam move.
Use the existing bank’s upper-level support without forcing it into the 1L sequence.
Evidence: relevance → character → witnesses → hearsay → privileges → experts → writings.
Criminal Procedure: Fourth Amendment → Miranda/Fifth Amendment → Sixth Amendment → identification.
Before memorizing a rule, mark whether the syllabus, lecture, casebook, or assigned authority changes the emphasis.
These sheets are built for the decisions the exam requires—not a promise that a shortcut replaces full preparation.
Call the issue, state the rule, identify the legally material fact, eliminate the attractive wrong choice, and commit.
Use a repeatable paragraph shape, then spend your time on the facts that make the rule matter.
Protect task compliance while you analyze the supplied File and Library.
Short rule checks stay separate from the application bank so you can repair the rule without confusing recall with performance.
Practice testing and distributed practice are the strongest broad recommendations in the learning-science literature; interleaving, feedback, and written transfer make the loop useful for legal application.
Designed for a real school day: one focused block with a visible stopping point.
Put syllabus coverage, professor emphasis, and your own first-attempt misses on one board.
Now: the unit in class. Next: the next assessment. Repair: weak rule due later. Write: one transfer rep before you stop.
Every explanation should answer why the key wins, why the tempting choice loses, and what to do next—without an outline-sized lecture.
Beta content is independently authored and undergoing legal-content review as part of ongoing QA. Report a suspected legal or explanation issue from the question screen so it can be corrected and re-reviewed.
Testify does not claim official NCBE authorship, psychometric validation, or a guaranteed pass. It will publish outcome percentages only with a documented cohort and denominator.
Study Aids are available for testing inside the protected app. They are educational scaffolds, not legal advice, and they should be checked against your syllabus, professor, current law, and official exam materials. There is no checkout or paid entitlement yet.
Online Your witty witness for rules, answer choices, MBE, MEE, MPT, and study strategy.
Wit is an AI study assistant, not a lawyer. Responses can be wrong about rules, cases, citations, exceptions, dates or jurisdiction. Content is educational, not legal advice or official exam grading. Confirm important points against current primary authority, your syllabus and official exam materials.
Hey — I’m Wit. What are we working through?
